-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Transaction Security Ciphers #397
Comments
Hi @DavoGiz, cipher support is constrained via the upstream FAPI specifications and leverages the BCP195. FAPI ID2 (Draft 06) states:
FAPI 1.0 now states:
Perhaps a better change to the data standards is to change the text for cipher support to be simply reference section 8.5 of the FAPI Advanced Profile (Read/Write). Something like:
This has previously been discussed in the FAPI WG with the reference to [BCP 195] and TLS 1.3 being considered. |
This issue was discussed in the 9th maintenance iteration call. The proposed wording update (above) to defer to the FAPI 1.0 specification will be accommodated in the migration to FAPI 1.0 consulted under Decision Proposal 209. Deferring to section 8.5 of FAPI ID2 would not achieve the intended outcome and the preference is not to backport text from FAPI 1.0 into the current CDS InfoSec profile. |
DP209 changes were incorporated into release v1.15.0. Refer to Decision 209 for further details. |
Description
Additional Ciphers added to Transaction Security
Area Affected
Transaction Security. My question is related to https://cdr-support.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/900003905546-Transaction-Security-ECDHE-Ciphers.
Can the following ciphers be added to the list of supported ciphers?
[0xc, 02b] TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256
[0xc, 02c] TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
The current specification is restricted to the following 4 ciphers.
TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 0x00, 0x9E
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 0xC0, 0x2F
TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 0x00, 0x9F
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 0xC0, 0x30
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: