You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I expect that when sharing, Acme and, say Quake, will want to chose a folder name that combines them - Dx/Acme-Quake/ - or, of course, based on their identities. But this is a rough start.
LMK
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Deals could be Acme-Quake or Project names. Typically project names seem
like a better idea if you want to keep it neutral (Acme-Quake or
Quake-Acme, and what if we have a 2nd deal together).
Would this make more sense?
I expect that when sharing, Acme and, say Quake, will want to chose a
folder name that combines them - Dx/Acme-Quake/ - or, of course, based on
their identities. But this is a rough start.
LMK
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #5.
Now have a number of documents in http://new.commonaccord.org/index.php?action=list&file=Dx/Acme/, including most recently a Consulting Agreement. It would be very good to expand these examples and message the naming of deal points. E.g., is "EffectiveDate.YMD" a good name?
Please let me know any thoughts about this way of organizing:
http://new.commonaccord.org/index.php?action=list&file=Dx/Acme/
I expect that when sharing, Acme and, say Quake, will want to chose a folder name that combines them - Dx/Acme-Quake/ - or, of course, based on their identities. But this is a rough start.
LMK
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: