Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deal examples #5

Open
HazardJ opened this issue Oct 1, 2015 · 2 comments
Open

Deal examples #5

HazardJ opened this issue Oct 1, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@HazardJ
Copy link
Member

HazardJ commented Oct 1, 2015

Please let me know any thoughts about this way of organizing:

http://new.commonaccord.org/index.php?action=list&file=Dx/Acme/

I expect that when sharing, Acme and, say Quake, will want to chose a folder name that combines them - Dx/Acme-Quake/ - or, of course, based on their identities. But this is a rough start.

LMK

@mdangear
Copy link
Contributor

mdangear commented Oct 1, 2015

Deals could be Acme-Quake or Project names. Typically project names seem
like a better idea if you want to keep it neutral (Acme-Quake or
Quake-Acme, and what if we have a 2nd deal together).
Would this make more sense?

On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 4:21 PM, HazardJ [email protected] wrote:

Please let me know any thoughts about this way of organizing:

http://new.commonaccord.org/index.php?action=list&file=Dx/Acme/

I expect that when sharing, Acme and, say Quake, will want to chose a
folder name that combines them - Dx/Acme-Quake/ - or, of course, based on
their identities. But this is a rough start.

LMK


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#5.

@HazardJ
Copy link
Member Author

HazardJ commented Oct 2, 2015

Now have a number of documents in http://new.commonaccord.org/index.php?action=list&file=Dx/Acme/, including most recently a Consulting Agreement. It would be very good to expand these examples and message the naming of deal points. E.g., is "EffectiveDate.YMD" a good name?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants