Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Possibility of inter Rule dependencies #23

Open
Tracked by #24
spflueger opened this issue Oct 8, 2020 · 0 comments
Open
Tracked by #24

Possibility of inter Rule dependencies #23

spflueger opened this issue Oct 8, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels
✨ Feature New feature added to the package

Comments

@spflueger
Copy link
Member

With the decoupling spin magnitude and projection, all Spin related rules have to perform a spin validity check internally (that magnitude and projection work together). If rules can specify other rules as dependencies this check can be outsourced nicely. Hence only one rule checks the correctness.
@redeboer redeboer transferred this issue from ComPWA/expertsystem Apr 6, 2021
@redeboer redeboer added ✨ Feature New feature added to the package Epic Collection of issues and removed Epic Collection of issues labels Apr 16, 2021
@redeboer redeboer mentioned this issue Mar 18, 2024
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
✨ Feature New feature added to the package
Projects
Student projects
Status: No status
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@spflueger @redeboer