Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

possibility to store_input for extractbatch function #130

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ondraveres
Copy link

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 30, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (0fcc64c) 95.92% compared to head (a929238) 95.76%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #130      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.92%   95.76%   -0.17%     
==========================================
  Files          21       21              
  Lines         565      567       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits          542      543       +1     
- Misses         23       24       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 95.76% <100.00%> (-0.17%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@simonmandlik
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the contribution!

This works on current master as extract(extractor, document_array; store_input)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants