You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Do we need a possibility to give additional metadata in VSS model to indicate type of branch (like branchtype: xxx)?
Or do we just need to define when a branch shall be used and possibly adapt the tree accordingly
Instance Handling
Instances have a specific syntax in VSS, but as part of the tooling process we expand them so they become branches just as any other branch. Does this approach work well for ontologies? How is VSSo as of today generated? Before/After expansion
We should also possibly think about a long term solution for the VSS <-> VSSo relationship. Possible to (always) generate VSSo from VSS, or better generate VSS from VSSo?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Some topics related to discussions at the AMM
What is a branch
branchtype: xxx
)?Instance Handling
Instances have a specific syntax in VSS, but as part of the tooling process we expand them so they become branches just as any other branch. Does this approach work well for ontologies? How is VSSo as of today generated? Before/After expansion
We should also possibly think about a long term solution for the VSS <-> VSSo relationship. Possible to (always) generate VSSo from VSS, or better generate VSS from VSSo?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: