You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What relies on Slug: being present in each notice? Is it used within notifications, or pelican etc? I see the URL doesn't rely on it and instead uses the markdown file name https://bugalert.org/content/notices/2021-12-09-log4j.html, nor do I see it in the Atom feed.
I'm just wondering how to deal with multiple notices for the same software, over time - as normally a slug would be a globally unique. Does that field need to be present here? Or if there is a dependency on it, maybe it should be the same as the base filename of the notice (to ensure it is unique):
Slug: 2021-12-09-log4j
Also, maybe clarify now what to do if there are multiple issues for a single product in a single day - I would say retroactively changing an existing notice to include a second issue would not be good unless there is a notification for major revisions to a notice. So a second notice should be made, would it be 2021-12-09_2-log4j etc.
Within the template,
202X-MM-DD-slug.md.template
:Slug: <NAME OF IMPACTED PRODUCT OR COMPONENT>
Within
2021-12-09-log4j.md
:Slug: log4j
What relies on
Slug:
being present in each notice? Is it used within notifications, or pelican etc? I see the URL doesn't rely on it and instead uses the markdown file namehttps://bugalert.org/content/notices/2021-12-09-log4j.html
, nor do I see it in the Atom feed.I'm just wondering how to deal with multiple notices for the same software, over time - as normally a slug would be a globally unique. Does that field need to be present here? Or if there is a dependency on it, maybe it should be the same as the base filename of the notice (to ensure it is unique):
Slug: 2021-12-09-log4j
Also, maybe clarify now what to do if there are multiple issues for a single product in a single day - I would say retroactively changing an existing notice to include a second issue would not be good unless there is a notification for major revisions to a notice. So a second notice should be made, would it be
2021-12-09_2-log4j
etc.Would it be worth enabling GitHub Discussions for minor questions?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: