Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Using itk::VectorImage instead of itk::Image<Vector<... #127

Open
fbudin69500 opened this issue Jan 28, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

Using itk::VectorImage instead of itk::Image<Vector<... #127

fbudin69500 opened this issue Jan 28, 2017 · 0 comments

Comments

@fbudin69500
Copy link
Collaborator

Using itk::VectorImage instead of itk::Image (and the corresponding itk::Dream3DImage) with vector components would allow to not hardcode the number of dimension for vectors, and therefore not limit the user to a small number of vector images that can be processed (currently only vectors of dimension 2 and 3 are accepted).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant