Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[ENH] Documentation Improvement #8

Open
ViridianForge opened this issue Oct 11, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

[ENH] Documentation Improvement #8

ViridianForge opened this issue Oct 11, 2019 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ViridianForge
Copy link
Contributor

In general - we should pass through the mffpy library and flesh out documentation to help the developers that are choosing to implement mffpy in their neurology analysis packages.

We're currently using Read The Docs though we've had a suggestion/request from the folks at MNE to utilize Sphinx to be in alignment with their documentation - should they bring mffpy into MNE.

Either way - we need to get the documentation generated as part of the CI/CD pipeline and then posted to an external location - that's another issue.
@ViridianForge ViridianForge added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 11, 2019
ViridianForge pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 24, 2019
@jusjusjus
Add requirements.txt.
b8ef2ea 
This commit fixes Issue #8

We add numpy==1.15 to conform with module `pacpy`.

We also add install instructions to README.
ViridianForge pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 24, 2019
@jusjusjus
Add requirements.txt.
bd0ff92 
This commit fixes Issue #8

We add numpy==1.15 to conform with module `pacpy`.

We also add install instructions to README.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@ViridianForge