-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 863
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make the eng/tools/generator
support data plane packages
#23820
Comments
Thank you for your feedback. Tagging and routing to the team member best able to assist. |
As the SDK automation would only be triggered when service team configured tspconfig.yaml, I suggest we enable it for data plane as well but limited the scope for only typespec input, suggestions? |
make sense. since sdk automation for go is required in ci check. we need to go through all the codes related with sdk automation and add data plane support. i'll let vendor to follow up first. |
CC: @jhendrixMSFT, @gracewilcox, @chlowell Just FYI, there is automation in azure-rest-api-specs that fails, today, on data-plane packages. I just filed this issue to track it. |
resolved by: #23879 |
I'm trying to merge in a change to the Event Grid Namespaces project and our Go step is still failing: PR run step failure. The log output doesn't say what the error is, only that it failed:
Is there something I need to do to properly opt-in or is there something broken in the change? |
@richardpark-msft i just realized that you need to config |
@tadelesh - thank you for the help on all of this. I'll update the tsp-config for now, we can discuss if we want to infer it at some point. |
The generator tool in
eng/tools/generator
is run in azure-rest-api-specs when you make a change. Currently, it makes some reasonable assumptions that you're working on an ARM package, so there are some checks that need to be relaxed or changed to properly work for data plane. This came up when I tried to merge in a change for tspconfig.yaml in EventGrid Namespaces: Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#31719.We were having a discussion in a (now merged) PR so I wanted to move it here so we can track it, and track any work that might result from that discussion.
(previous comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: