-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Revise watch rating system #423
Comments
My proposal:
Second star: any of:
Third star: all of:
Fourth star:
Fifth star:
|
I'd also add the categories for these ratings to the wiki so that users have a better understanding of what we assess |
Having skimmed through all watches and calculating the star rating according to the new proposed rating rules, i have no obligation against these changes and welcome the added clarity and traceability. Many users showed slight confusion over the current rating system, especially about the fact that rather old watches with few hardware features have a better rating than newer and available ones. |
Makes sense to me too yes :) Thanks! |
Currently the rating system does not really reflect what watches we recommend to new users. We frequently recommend catfish and beluga, while the top two watches on the ratings page are still bass and sturgeon. I think it would be wise to revise the rating system (from what was introduced in #80 ) to something that reflects our current favourite.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: