Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Size Fractionation #9

Open
Drob84761 opened this issue Apr 14, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Size Fractionation #9

Drob84761 opened this issue Apr 14, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@Drob84761
Copy link

I filtered my samples at .2 microns and then I also sequenced the free floating section. How will this affect my use of your program?

@KrisKieft
Copy link
Member

You will probably end up with inaccurate results, or more specifically you'll likely end up finding fewer active viruses than there actually are. If you separate the viruses (most of the under 0.2 micron) from the greater than 0.2 micron fraction then you are separating a lot of the active viruses (their genome copies). You can run propagate on the greater than 0.2 micron and capture some active viruses. You can't really combine the sequencing results from the two fractions because the coverage ratios will not be accurate. You can try running propagate but keep these caveats in mind.

Kris

@Drob84761
Copy link
Author

So even if these samples are cross assembled we still can't compare them accurately?

@KrisKieft
Copy link
Member

The discrepancies in coverage will show up when they are sequenced due to differences in read depth and sequence abundances.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants