Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rewrite source paths for extracted raster images #261

Open
pkra opened this issue Jan 31, 2020 · 4 comments
Open

rewrite source paths for extracted raster images #261

pkra opened this issue Jan 31, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@pkra
Copy link
Member

pkra commented Jan 31, 2020

We currently rewrite image sources (for raster images extracted from SVG) further downstream (e.g., ams-html, ams-bookhtml).

We should consider doing so here.

@pkra pkra changed the title rewrite image sources rewrite source paths for extracted raster images Jan 31, 2020
@pkra pkra added this to the 2023 milestone Jan 18, 2023
@pkra pkra self-assigned this Jan 18, 2023
@pkra pkra modified the milestones: 2023, 2024 Jan 15, 2024
@pkra pkra modified the milestones: 2024, 2025 Jan 7, 2025
@pkra
Copy link
Member Author

pkra commented Jan 7, 2025

This should probably be done by extending the image alt dictionary

* @param {Object} imageAltDictionary - Key value store with file names and alt text strings

That would likely end up a breaking change.

@pkra
Copy link
Member Author

pkra commented Jan 7, 2025

It would help avoid duplication downstream. (However, books also have an adjustment for the folder structure; I'm not sure if that part would make sense here.)

@pkra pkra added the upstream label Jan 16, 2025
@pkra
Copy link
Member Author

pkra commented Jan 16, 2025

Marking this as upstream since we'd need something to generate path adjustments and pass them to texml-to-html.

@pkra
Copy link
Member Author

pkra commented Jan 16, 2025

"upstream" here means "whatever calls texml-to-html" (i.e., not texml).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant