Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Endre Checksum vekk fra MD5, til en bedre hashing algoritme #526

Open
Andreass2 opened this issue Aug 20, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Endre Checksum vekk fra MD5, til en bedre hashing algoritme #526

Andreass2 opened this issue Aug 20, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
kind/chore Routine task or minor maintenance work that doesn't introduce new features or functionality product/formidling Issues related til Altinn Broker product/meldingstjenesten Issues related til Altinn Correspondence

Comments

@Andreass2
Copy link
Collaborator

Andreass2 commented Aug 20, 2024

Etter tilbakemelding fra Pen test er vi anbefalt å byttte ut MD5 hasingalgoritmen til en algoritme som passer formålet bedre.
Det er ikke ansett som et stort sikkerhetesproblem.

Denne issuen er basert på tilbakemelding fra #455

@Andreass2 Andreass2 converted this from a draft issue Aug 20, 2024
@Andreass2 Andreass2 added kind/chore Routine task or minor maintenance work that doesn't introduce new features or functionality product/meldingstjenesten Issues related til Altinn Correspondence product/formidling Issues related til Altinn Broker labels Aug 20, 2024
@leogasnier leogasnier moved this from 🆕 New to Refinement in Altinn melding og formidling Oct 10, 2024
@leogasnier leogasnier moved this from Refinement to 📋 Backlog in Altinn melding og formidling Nov 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/chore Routine task or minor maintenance work that doesn't introduce new features or functionality product/formidling Issues related til Altinn Broker product/meldingstjenesten Issues related til Altinn Correspondence
Projects
Status: 📋 Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant