Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

glossary 17.2: object-oriented programming: possible too restrictive definition #99

Open
jgmbenoit opened this issue Aug 9, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

glossary 17.2: object-oriented programming: possible too restrictive definition #99

jgmbenoit opened this issue Aug 9, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@jgmbenoit
Copy link

What bother me a bit is into classes and methods: I find this restrictive. In language C we can program in an oriented manner without involving classes and methods. (Note that I have a good practice of C but without a theoretical background in programming.)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@jgmbenoit