You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We ignore the fact that malloc() may return null. LLVM seems to be going into a stricter direction. We need to reevaluate and test if a stricter memory model & refinement criteria makes sense now.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For this case only, tgt has no allocation - so we can individually assign nonnull-ness to each malloc.
To correctly deal with this issue, I think we need a mapping between allocations in src and tgt.
For the mapped blocks, the nonnull-ness must be equivalent.
see this:
We ignore the fact that malloc() may return null. LLVM seems to be going into a stricter direction. We need to reevaluate and test if a stricter memory model & refinement criteria makes sense now.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: