We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
For the soil workability A_SILT_MI is used. Is that correct? According to Locher and Backer leem = lutum + silt
A_SILT_MI
https://github.com/AgroCares/Open-Bodem-Index-Calculator/blob/7b799211c348c3cd15e7544cec5cc36c627fc171/R/workability.R#L92C35-L92C35
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Do I understand correctly that you are wondering whether:
# sandy soils with variable silt content dt[soiltype.m == 'zand' & A_SILT_MI < 10, c(cols) := list(45,35)] dt[soiltype.m == 'zand' & A_SILT_MI >= 10 & A_SILT_MI < 20, c(cols) := list(55,30)] dt[soiltype.m == 'zand' & A_SILT_MI >= 20, c(cols) := list(60,30)]
should be changed to:
# sandy soils with variable silt content dt[soiltype.m == 'zand' & A_SILT_MI + A_CLAY_MI < 10, c(cols) := list(45,35)] dt[soiltype.m == 'zand' & A_SILT_MI + A_CLAY_MI >= 10 & A_SILT_MI+ A_CLAY_MI < 20, c(cols) := list(55,30)] dt[soiltype.m == 'zand' & A_SILT_MI + A_CLAY_MI >= 20, c(cols) := list(60,30)]
?
Sorry, something went wrong.
yes indeed. That will result in higher depths.
you forgot 1 in the second line:
dt[soiltype.m == 'zand' & A_SILT_MI + A_CLAY_MI >= 10 & A_SILT_MI + A_CLAY_MI < 20, c(cols) := list(55,30)]
No branches or pull requests
For the soil workability
A_SILT_MI
is used. Is that correct? According to Locher and Backer leem = lutum + silthttps://github.com/AgroCares/Open-Bodem-Index-Calculator/blob/7b799211c348c3cd15e7544cec5cc36c627fc171/R/workability.R#L92C35-L92C35
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: