New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

check indicator function for WHC #169

Open

gerardhros opened this issue Aug 6, 2022 · 0 comments

Contributor

gerardhros commented Aug 6, 2022

it looks like the indicator function for WHC, WP and FC is incorrect.
PAW, WP and FC are in units mm, whereas WHC is still in units %.

the indicator function for PAW has optimum around 100 mm.
for WHC, WP and FC it looks like these are made for units %.
Please update.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment