-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Copy path1_intro.tex
118 lines (110 loc) · 6.02 KB
/
1_intro.tex
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
%*********************************************************************
% INTRODUCTION TO RESEARCH PROPOSAL
%*********************************************************************
\chapter{Introduction}
\label{ch:intro}
%---------------------------------------------------------------------
% Give a brief background to the focus of your work. Highlight
% why the work is significant and how it will contribute to your
% field. It must be clear why the work is being conducted.
%
% Each research question should generate a mini-hypothesis and
% lead to one research aim. Each aim will then form the main
% chapters of your thesis. For a PhD thesis each of these aims
% should be planned with a paper output in mind. The research
% questions should be tightly linked to your overall hypothesis.
% The hypothesis should be supported up by your literature research.
%
% A PhD thesis must be novel work, however an MSc project only needs
% to demonstrate advanced mastering of a particular technique or
% research area.
%
% Outline the scope of the work. Keep your timeline and resources
% in mind here. Be realistic. A PhD thesis should not take longer
% than 2.5 years, ideally, if you plan to submit in August of your
% 3rd year (6 mon research proposal and preliminary investigation;
% 1.5 yr experimental work; 6 mon write up) and an MSc project
% should not take longer than 18 months, ideally, if you wish to
% submit in August of your 2nd year (3 mon preliminary investigation
% and proposal; 1 yr experimental work; 3 mon write up).
%
% Plan your paper outputs at this stage. Look for peer-reviewed
% journals-conferences that are relevant to your field of research
% and consider how to write up your work as a paper. If you expect
% to produce an artefact-product also list these outputs. Be realistic,
% it is better to have fewer papers of high quality and impact than
% more poor quality papers.
%---------------------------------------------------------------------
% Taken from "Scientific Writing by D. Branch Moody"
%---------------------------------------------------------------------
% The Introduction appears in the manuscript prior to the results
% and methods section, yet this guide explains that it is better to
% write the results and methods first. This is no accident. The
% results and methods are the substantial core of the paper so it
% is helpful to have a really concrete description of the data before
% the writing the more subjective sections that connect to the larger
% literature.
%
% The introduction usually starts with a significance statement - an
% idea that nearly everyone would accept as clearly important.
% Example: "T cells play a key role in immune response." Next
% comes a statement of missing knowledge followed by a general
% description of the results of the manuscript. As with paper
% titles, the main goal is to draw the reader in. Writing
% introductions requires creativity, such that the approach to
% every paper is somewhat different. Yet a few reliable and broadly
% applicable suggestions follow:
%
% First sentence. It should have punch and say something important
% and/or surprising.
%
% Keep it short. Five or fewer paragraphs is best and at some short
% form journals you only get one half of one paragraph.
%
% Head off confusion later. Introduce any key reagents or
% experimental systems that are unfamiliar to most readers.
%
% Last paragraph of the introduction. By tradition, this is
% usually an overview of the findings starting with "Here we
% report?" The most common mistake is to preview each of the
% three or four key findings of the paper. This is unnecessary
% because the reader has just read the abstract one page earlier,
% so a detailed listing of results becomes redundant (and also gives
% away the surprise of the story.) Instead the authors can point
% to a general problem that is solved here using broader language.
% Example, "Whereas most studies in the field have emphasized
% the separate roles of Toll like receptors and inflammasome
% activation, our results carried out with mouse macrophages in vitro
% and in vivo, identify stimuli that effective activate both TLRs
% and the inflammasome." In this case, the identity of the
% stimulus and stepwise approach to discovering it are not needed
% in the introduction section because the results section will
% explain this in detail.
%=====================================================================
\section{Problem statement}
\label{sec:problemstatement}
%The research problem statement refers to an area of concern, a condition to be improved upon, a challenge to be explored, a difficulty to be eliminated, or a scholarly question the requires further interrogation to ground theory and praxis, that points to the need for meaningful understanding and deliberate investigation.
%=====================================================================
\section{Research questions and hypothesis}
\label{sec:hyphothesis}
%---------------------------------------------------------------------
%link these to your aims and work packages
From these questions I propose that:
\begin{guess*}
\begin{minipage}[t]{5 in}
Hypothesis
\end{minipage}
\end{guess*}
%=====================================================================
\section{Scope, assumptions and limitations}
\label{sec:scope}
%---------------------------------------------------------------------
%=====================================================================
\section{Potential impact and outputs}
\label{sec:outputs}
%---------------------------------------------------------------------
%• Impact refers to both the tangible and intangible influence derived and/or caused by the research outcomes/outputs.
%• Impact statements indicate what the researcher hopes to achieve, without introducing any bias, through their research (i.e., impact on Global Change and/or Bio-economy, etc.).
%*********************************************************************
% End of Introduction
%*********************************************************************