-
The outputs of | SCM/Small-domain LES with ice | {prefix}_FixN | are expected on 1 April. A related issue is that if we use a 2-moment prognostic bulk scheme for ice, then some of the processes (for example freezing and riming) would reduce the mass of cloud droplets while keeping their number. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
This simulation is intended to test SCM results when droplet number concentration is fixed and ice formation is diagnostic. In ModelE3, we use the following approaches. First, when droplet number concentration is used, then we assume that it is the specified fixed concentration. Second, when the conditions for ice formation exist (liquid and temperature thresholds exceeded) and the ice number concentration is also below the specified fixed concentration, then we follow an immersion freezing process to produce sufficient ice to reach the specified fixed concentration. We note that the immersion freezing process would reduce the droplet number concentration if it were permitted to deviate from the fixed value. Other processes such as vapor exchange also change the mass of cloud droplets. Thank you of the question, and please let us know if anything remains unclear. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
@jchylik Yes, that is correct. The diagnostic ice formation is intended to prevent ice number concentration from falling below the specified value when temperatures are too warm for homogeneous droplet freezing. If clouds get deep and cold enough to trigger homogeneous drop freezing in your model, that would be an additional source of ice.