-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 229
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
bundle() creates a invalid $ref #338
Comments
If you could provide the schemas that cause the issue we could debug it and add a test case |
Sure, I'll try to deliver the schemas this week. Need to anonymize them first. Thanks in advance. |
I finally found the time to strip down the schemas. If you (The schemas are quite complex, stripped down over 1000 lines. If anything does not work, let me know.) Here's the bundled schema: {
"$id": "http://example.com/schemaA/1.0",
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
"type": "object",
"allOf": [
{
"type": "object",
"required": [
"eventId",
"payload"
],
"properties": {
"eventId": {
"type": "string"
}
}
},
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"payload": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"allOf": [
{
"type": "object"
},
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"reservationActionMetaData": {
"allOf": [
{
"allOf": [
{
"type": "object",
"required": [
"supplierPriceElements"
],
"properties": {
"supplierPriceElements": {
"allOf": [
{
"required": [
"type"
],
"properties": {
"type": {
"type": "string"
}
}
},
{
"type": "object",
"required": [
"purchaseRate"
],
"properties": {
"purchaseRate": {
"allOf": [
{
"type": "object",
"required": [
"amount",
"currency"
],
"properties": {
"amount": {
"type": "number",
"format": "float"
},
"currency": {
"type": "string",
"minLength": 1
}
}
},
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"inDetail": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"perDate": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"date": {
"type": "string",
"format": "date"
},
"amount": {
"$ref": "#/allOf/1/properties/payload/items/allOf/1/properties/reservationActionMetaData/allOf/0/allOf/0/properties/supplierPriceElements/allOf/1/properties/fee/properties/modificationFee/properties/amount"
},
"detailedPriceInformation": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"amount": {
"$ref": "#/allOf/1/properties/payload/items/allOf/1/properties/reservationActionMetaData/allOf/0/allOf/0/properties/supplierPriceElements/allOf/1/properties/fee/properties/modificationFee/properties/amount"
},
"paxId": {
"type": "string"
},
"inDetail": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"rate": {
"$ref": "#/allOf/1/properties/payload/items/allOf/1/properties/reservationActionMetaData/allOf/0/allOf/0/properties/supplierPriceElements/allOf/1/properties/fee/properties/modificationFee/properties/amount"
},
"board": {
"$ref": "#/allOf/1/properties/payload/items/allOf/1/properties/reservationActionMetaData/allOf/0/allOf/0/properties/supplierPriceElements/allOf/1/properties/fee/properties/modificationFee/properties/amount"
},
"taxes": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"$ref": "#/allOf/1/properties/payload/items/allOf/1/properties/reservationActionMetaData/allOf/0/allOf/0/properties/supplierPriceElements/allOf/1/properties/purchaseRate/allOf/1/properties/inDetail/properties/perDate/items/properties/detailedPriceInformation/items/properties/inDetail/properties/fees/items"
}
},
"fees": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"id": {
"type": "string"
},
"amount": {
"$ref": "#/allOf/1/properties/payload/items/allOf/1/properties/reservationActionMetaData/allOf/0/allOf/0/properties/supplierPriceElements/allOf/1/properties/fee/properties/modificationFee/properties/amount"
}
}
}
},
"supplements": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"$ref": "#/allOf/1/properties/payload/items/allOf/1/properties/reservationActionMetaData/allOf/0/allOf/0/properties/supplierPriceElements/allOf/1/properties/purchaseRate/allOf/1/properties/inDetail/properties/perDate/items/properties/detailedPriceInformation/items/properties/inDetail/properties/fees/items"
}
},
"salesOfferIds": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"$ref": "#/allOf/1/properties/payload/items/allOf/1/properties/reservationActionMetaData/allOf/0/allOf/0/properties/supplierPriceElements/allOf/1/properties/purchaseRate/allOf/1/properties/inDetail/properties/perDate/items/properties/detailedPriceInformation/items/properties/inDetail/properties/fees/items"
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
},
"perPax": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"id": {
"type": "string"
},
"amount": {
"$ref": "#/allOf/1/properties/payload/items/allOf/1/properties/reservationActionMetaData/allOf/0/allOf/0/properties/supplierPriceElements/allOf/1/properties/fee/properties/modificationFee/properties/amount"
},
"salesOfferIds": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "string"
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
]
},
"fee": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"modificationFee": {
"$ref": "#/allOf/1/properties/payload/items/allOf/1/properties/reservationActionMetaData/allOf/0/allOf/0/properties/supplierPriceElements/allOf/1/properties/purchaseRate/allOf/0"
},
"cancellationFee": {
"$ref": "#/allOf/1/properties/payload/items/allOf/1/properties/reservationActionMetaData/allOf/0/allOf/0/properties/supplierPriceElements/allOf/1/properties/purchaseRate/allOf/0"
}
}
}
}
}
]
},
"type": {
"type": "string"
}
}
},
{
"type": "object",
"required": [
"test"
],
"properties": {
"test": {
"type": "string"
}
}
}
],
"properties": {
"type": {
"type": "string"
}
}
},
{
"type": "object",
"required": [
"test"
],
"properties": {
"test": {
"type": "string"
}
}
}
]
}
}
}
]
}
}
}
}
]
} Thanks in advance! :-) |
This looks like a bug with https://www.jsonschemavalidator.net/ - what part of the json schema is invalid? It's a $ref that points to another $ref, with a few layers of indirection, but it eventually resolves to the right value. A referenced path is valid post all dereferencing - in your example, Here's the smallest reproducible example that bugs out on that site: {
"$id": "schemaA/1.0",
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
"type": "object",
"$ref": "schemaB.json#/definitions/SupplierPriceElement"
} SchemaB {
"$id": "schemaC/1.0",
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
"definitions": {
"SupplierPriceElement": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"purchaseRate": {
"$ref": "#/definitions/InDetailParent"
},
"fee": {
"$ref": "#/definitions/AllFees"
}
}
},
"AllFees": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"modificationFee": {
"$ref": "#/definitions/MonetaryAmount"
}
}
},
"MonetaryAmount": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"amount": {
"$ref": "#/definitions/Amount"
}
}
},
"Amount": {
"type": "number",
"format": "float"
},
"InDetailParent": {
"allOf": [
{
"$ref": "#/definitions/MonetaryAmount"
},
{
"type": "object",
"$ref": "#/definitions/Amount"
}
]
}
}
} This produces {
"$id": "schemaA/1.0",
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"purchaseRate": {
"allOf": [
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"amount": {
"type": "number",
"format": "float"
}
}
},
{
"type": "object",
"$ref": "#/properties/fee/properties/modificationFee/properties/amount"
}
]
},
"fee": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"modificationFee": {
"$ref": "#/properties/purchaseRate/allOf/0"
}
}
}
}
} The site considers this invalid, but it considers the exact same spec with the keys rearranged in order as valid {
"$id": "schemaA/1.0",
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"fee": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"modificationFee": {
"$ref": "#/properties/purchaseRate/allOf/0"
}
}
},
"purchaseRate": {
"allOf": [
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"amount": {
"type": "number",
"format": "float"
}
}
},
{
"type": "object",
"$ref": "#/properties/fee/properties/modificationFee/properties/amount"
}
]
}
}
} Even though the files are identical: Please let me know if I got something wrong here |
Hello @jonluca, Thank you for your response. I recently tested the schema you mentioned (which was not functioning) and also the “re-arranged” schema (which worked) using www.jsonschemavalidator.com. You are correct; when rearranged, it seems to work like magic. Unfortunately, this behavior is only observed in the context of this specific JSON validator. I also tested it
with the non-re-arranged and the re-arranged schemas. All compilers / validators have encountered the following errors with both schemas:
I also attempted to locate relevant information within the Draft 7 specifications, but unfortunately, I could not find any specific details on this topic. It appears that perhaps this usage was never originally intended, as all the compilers and validators I tested have encountered failures. Alternatively, it’s possible that various projects have misinterpreted the specifications or overlooked implementing this particular feature. As numerous compilers and validators struggle to interpret this bundled schema, is there a way to override this behavior? Thank you in advance. |
Hello @jonluca, is it possible to re-open this ticket and discuss the findings I provided with the different compilers? I still think the created Thanks in advance. |
Hello @jonluca, thank you for re-opening the issue. While searching through the specifications this morning, I discovered some links to the official JSON Schema Spec Github project and thought: Maybe I could just ask them, as they are the officials and maybe have an answer to this topic, as this would make it easier for us both. Here's my question (issue) I opened at their project. And someone also just answered: As it seems, the Thanks in advance. |
hello i came across this issue because i encounter the same undesired behavior, like others (see hey-api/openapi-ts#1135). There is an option to disable the faulty ref internal bundler ? |
We are using the
json-schema-ref-parser
library to flatten / dereference our schemas. As we need to return them over an API, we usebundle()
as sometimes circular references can occur in the given JSON schemas.One user just discovered that his schema got invalid after using bundle() as four refs got replaced with a non-valid ref, pointing to a non-existing path. These schemas are quite complicated with many allOfs. I reproduced the broken schema and removed everything so just the invalid ref and needed surroundings are given:
One ref (amount) points to a path (modificationFee) which contains another ref - and this contains the needed data. But the compiler cannot compile this (e.g. https://www.jsonschemavalidator.net/).
Error message:
I can try to provide some stripped down schemas, but this could take some time. We have three schemas which reference themselves like A -(one ref)-> B -(multiple refs)-> C.
Maybe you have already an idea how this could happen?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: