Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.22.3 - autoclosed #400

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jun 30, 2023

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
react-router-dom (source) 6.14.0 -> 6.22.3 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

remix-run/react-router (react-router-dom)

v6.22.3

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.22.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.22.1

Compare Source

v6.22.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Include a window__reactRouterVersion tag for CWV Report detection (#​11222)
Patch Changes

v6.21.3

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • Fix NavLink isPending when a basename is used (#​11195)
  • Remove leftover unstable_ prefix from Blocker/BlockerFunction types (#​11187)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.21.2

Compare Source

v6.21.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.21.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Add a new future.v7_relativeSplatPath flag to implement a breaking bug fix to relative routing when inside a splat route. (#​11087)

    This fix was originally added in #​10983 and was later reverted in #​11078 because it was determined that a large number of existing applications were relying on the buggy behavior (see #​11052)

    The Bug
    The buggy behavior is that without this flag, the default behavior when resolving relative paths is to ignore any splat (*) portion of the current route path.

    The Background
    This decision was originally made thinking that it would make the concept of nested different sections of your apps in <Routes> easier if relative routing would replace the current splat:

    <BrowserRouter>
      <Routes>
        <Route path="/" element={<Home />} />
        <Route path="dashboard/*" element={<Dashboard />} />
      </Routes>
    </BrowserRouter>

    Any paths like /dashboard, /dashboard/team, /dashboard/projects will match the Dashboard route. The dashboard component itself can then render nested <Routes>:

    function Dashboard() {
      return (
        <div>
          <h2>Dashboard</h2>
          <nav>
            <Link to="/">Dashboard Home</Link>
            <Link to="team">Team</Link>
            <Link to="projects">Projects</Link>
          </nav>
    
          <Routes>
            <Route path="/" element={<DashboardHome />} />
            <Route path="team" element={<DashboardTeam />} />
            <Route path="projects" element={<DashboardProjects />} />
          </Routes>
        </div>
      );
    }

    Now, all links and route paths are relative to the router above them. This makes code splitting and compartmentalizing your app really easy. You could render the Dashboard as its own independent app, or embed it into your large app without making any changes to it.

    The Problem

    The problem is that this concept of ignoring part of a path breaks a lot of other assumptions in React Router - namely that "." always means the current location pathname for that route. When we ignore the splat portion, we start getting invalid paths when using ".":

    // If we are on URL /dashboard/team, and we want to link to /dashboard/team:
    function DashboardTeam() {
      // ❌ This is broken and results in <a href="/dashboard">
      return <Link to=".">A broken link to the Current URL</Link>;
    
      // ✅ This is fixed but super unintuitive since we're already at /dashboard/team!
      return <Link to="./team">A broken link to the Current URL</Link>;
    }

    We've also introduced an issue that we can no longer move our DashboardTeam component around our route hierarchy easily - since it behaves differently if we're underneath a non-splat route, such as /dashboard/:widget. Now, our "." links will, properly point to ourself inclusive of the dynamic param value so behavior will break from it's corresponding usage in a /dashboard/* route.

    Even worse, consider a nested splat route configuration:

    <BrowserRouter>
      <Routes>
        <Route path="dashboard">
          <Route path="*" element={<Dashboard />} />
        </Route>
      </Routes>
    </BrowserRouter>

    Now, a <Link to="."> and a <Link to=".."> inside the Dashboard component go to the same place! That is definitely not correct!

    Another common issue arose in Data Routers (and Remix) where any <Form> should post to it's own route action if you the user doesn't specify a form action:

    let router = createBrowserRouter({
      path: "/dashboard",
      children: [
        {
          path: "*",
          action: dashboardAction,
          Component() {
            // ❌ This form is broken!  It throws a 405 error when it submits because
            // it tries to submit to /dashboard (without the splat value) and the parent
            // `/dashboard` route doesn't have an action
            return <Form method="post">...</Form>;
          },
        },
      ],
    });

    This is just a compounded issue from the above because the default location for a Form to submit to is itself (".") - and if we ignore the splat portion, that now resolves to the parent route.

    The Solution
    If you are leveraging this behavior, it's recommended to enable the future flag, move your splat to it's own route, and leverage ../ for any links to "sibling" pages:

    <BrowserRouter>
      <Routes>
        <Route path="dashboard">
          <Route index path="*" element={<Dashboard />} />
        </Route>
      </Routes>
    </BrowserRouter>
    
    function Dashboard() {
      return (
        <div>
          <h2>Dashboard</h2>
          <nav>
            <Link to="..">Dashboard Home</Link>
            <Link to="../team">Team</Link>
            <Link to="../projects">Projects</Link>
          </nav>
    
          <Routes>
            <Route path="/" element={<DashboardHome />} />
            <Route path="team" element={<DashboardTeam />} />
            <Route path="projects" element={<DashboardProjects />} />
          </Router>
        </div>
      );
    }

    This way, . means "the full current pathname for my route" in all cases (including static, dynamic, and splat routes) and .. always means "my parents pathname".

Patch Changes

v6.20.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.20.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Export the PathParam type from the public API (#​10719)
Patch Changes

v6.19.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Add unstable_flushSync option to useNavigate/useSumbit/fetcher.load/fetcher.submit to opt-out of React.startTransition and into ReactDOM.flushSync for state updates (#​11005)
  • Allow unstable_usePrompt to accept a BlockerFunction in addition to a boolean (#​10991)
Patch Changes
  • Fix issue where a changing fetcher key in a useFetcher that remains mounted wasn't getting picked up (#​11009)
  • Fix useFormAction which was incorrectly inheriting the ?index query param from child route action submissions (#​11025)
  • Fix NavLink active logic when to location has a trailing slash (#​10734)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.18.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Add support for manual fetcher key specification via useFetcher({ key: string }) so you can access the same fetcher instance from different components in your application without prop-drilling (RFC) (#​10960)

    • Fetcher keys are now also exposed on the fetchers returned from useFetchers so that they can be looked up by key
  • Add navigate/fetcherKey params/props to useSumbit/Form to support kicking off a fetcher submission under the hood with an optionally user-specified key (#​10960)

    • Invoking a fetcher in this way is ephemeral and stateless
    • If you need to access the state of one of these fetchers, you will need to leverage useFetcher({ key }) to look it up elsewhere
Patch Changes
  • Adds a fetcher context to RouterProvider that holds completed fetcher data, in preparation for the upcoming future flag that will change the fetcher persistence/cleanup behavior (#​10961)
  • Fix the future prop on BrowserRouter, HashRouter and MemoryRouter so that it accepts a Partial<FutureConfig> instead of requiring all flags to be included. (#​10962)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.17.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Add experimental support for the View Transitions API via document.startViewTransition to enable CSS animated transitions on SPA navigations in your application. (#​10916)

    The simplest approach to enabling a View Transition in your React Router app is via the new <Link unstable_viewTransition> prop. This will cause the navigation DOM update to be wrapped in document.startViewTransition which will enable transitions for the DOM update. Without any additional CSS styles, you'll get a basic cross-fade animation for your page.

    If you need to apply more fine-grained styles for your animations, you can leverage the unstable_useViewTransitionState hook which will tell you when a transition is in progress and you can use that to apply classes or styles:

    function ImageLink(to, src, alt) {
      let isTransitioning = unstable_useViewTransitionState(to);
      return (
        <Link to={to} unstable_viewTransition>
          <img
            src={src}
            alt={alt}
            style={{
              viewTransitionName: isTransitioning ? "image-expand" : "",
            }}
          />
        </Link>
      );
    }

    You can also use the <NavLink unstable_viewTransition> shorthand which will manage the hook usage for you and automatically add a transitioning class to the <a> during the transition:

    a.transitioning img {
      view-transition-name: "image-expand";
    }
    <NavLink to={to} unstable_viewTransition>
      <img src={src} alt={alt} />
    </NavLink>

    For an example usage of View Transitions with React Router, check out our fork of the Astro Records demo.

    For more information on using the View Transitions API, please refer to the Smooth and simple transitions with the View Transitions API guide from the Google Chrome team.

    Please note, that because the ViewTransition API is a DOM API, we now export a specific RouterProvider from react-router-dom with this functionality. If you are importing RouterProvider from react-router, then it will not support view transitions. (#​10928

Patch Changes

v6.16.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
Patch Changes
  • Properly encode rendered URIs in server rendering to avoid hydration errors (#​10769)

v6.15.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Add's a new redirectDocument() function which allows users to specify that a redirect from a loader/action should trigger a document reload (via window.location) instead of attempting to navigate to the redirected location via React Router (#​10705)
Patch Changes
  • Fixes an edge-case affecting web extensions in Firefox that use URLSearchParams and the useSearchParams hook. (#​10620)
  • Do not include hash in useFormAction() for unspecified actions since it cannot be determined on the server and causes hydration issues (#​10758)
  • Reorder effects in unstable_usePrompt to avoid throwing an exception if the prompt is unblocked and a navigation is performed synchronously (#​10687, #​10718)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.14.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • Properly decode element id when emulating hash scrolling via <ScrollRestoration> (#​10682)
  • Add missing <Form state> prop to populate history.state on submission navigations (#​10630)
  • Support proper hydration of Error subclasses such as ReferenceError/TypeError (#​10633)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.14.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.14.1 chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.14.2 Jul 17, 2023
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from 5804174 to 47e96fb Compare July 17, 2023 21:59
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.14.2 chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.15.0 Aug 10, 2023
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from 47e96fb to 012ab3e Compare August 10, 2023 15:22
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.15.0 chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.16.0 Sep 13, 2023
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from 012ab3e to 8ab8224 Compare September 13, 2023 20:32
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.16.0 chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.17.0 Oct 16, 2023
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from 8ab8224 to e9cc1cc Compare October 16, 2023 16:20
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.17.0 chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.18.0 Oct 31, 2023
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from e9cc1cc to c347e1c Compare October 31, 2023 17:43
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.18.0 chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.19.0 Nov 16, 2023
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from c347e1c to cd7ed14 Compare November 16, 2023 17:15
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.19.0 chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.20.0 Nov 22, 2023
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from cd7ed14 to e6a2b84 Compare November 22, 2023 22:47
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.20.0 chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.20.1 Dec 1, 2023
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from e6a2b84 to 60ee147 Compare December 1, 2023 23:47
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.20.1 chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.21.0 Dec 13, 2023
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from 60ee147 to df28a95 Compare December 13, 2023 23:26
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from df28a95 to dca0cdf Compare December 21, 2023 17:10
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.21.0 chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.21.1 Dec 21, 2023
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.21.1 chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.21.2 Jan 11, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from dca0cdf to 9114b8d Compare January 11, 2024 17:00
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.21.2 chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.21.3 Jan 18, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from 9114b8d to 3f60b47 Compare January 18, 2024 21:36
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.21.3 chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.22.0 Feb 1, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from 3f60b47 to c760071 Compare February 1, 2024 22:34
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from c760071 to 9b45554 Compare February 16, 2024 21:27
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.22.0 chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.22.1 Feb 16, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from 9b45554 to 3df26fe Compare February 28, 2024 22:55
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.22.1 chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.22.2 Feb 28, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from 3df26fe to 427b2e2 Compare March 7, 2024 17:39
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.22.2 chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.22.3 Mar 7, 2024
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.22.3 chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.22.3 - autoclosed Mar 11, 2024
@renovate renovate bot closed this Mar 11, 2024
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch March 11, 2024 09:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants