You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Whilst working on #948 I noticed that in some places check_vectors_candidate_points (nee checkVectorsCandidatePoints) was commented out (lines 83 and 187) in favour of using find_next_best_point (nee findNextBestPoint) but check_vectors_candidate_points is still used in some places.
Is this deliberate?
Can or should find_next_best_point replace all calls made to check_vectors_candidate_points?
If we can remove old legacy code we should it only serves to confuse our future selves and others.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
ns-rse
changed the title
check_vectors_candidate_points() v find_nex_best_point()
check_vectors_candidate_points() v find_next_best_point()
Oct 16, 2024
Whilst working on #948 I noticed that in some places
check_vectors_candidate_points
(neecheckVectorsCandidatePoints
) was commented out (lines 83 and 187) in favour of usingfind_next_best_point
(neefindNextBestPoint
) butcheck_vectors_candidate_points
is still used in some places.find_next_best_point
replace all calls made tocheck_vectors_candidate_points
?If we can remove old legacy code we should it only serves to confuse our future selves and others.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: