You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi -- I am an author of one the papers you cited in your study (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425723001256) which uses multi temporal cloud masking + histogram equalization to construct analysis ready data. Your approach looks very promising! I am going to try it out next week and I'll let you know if it improves our ARD :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Following up on this -- I compared Vint2 to the cloud removal algorithm that we use, which is essentially:
Identify cloudy areas
Make a cloud-free composite by histogram equalizing and gapfilling
Use the cloud-free composite to train a per-image gradient boosting machine to predict values for cloudy pixels
VPint2 looks really good in many areas that I tested that have low band standard deviations (e.g. dense forests), but in areas with high non-cloud values, like on farmland, the reconstruction from VPint2 seems to have really low contrast, e.g. here in Ghana:
Hi -- I am an author of one the papers you cited in your study (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425723001256) which uses multi temporal cloud masking + histogram equalization to construct analysis ready data. Your approach looks very promising! I am going to try it out next week and I'll let you know if it improves our ARD :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: