We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
In https://github.com/4D-Technologies/openidconnect_flutter/blob/main/openidconnect/lib/src/config/openidconfiguration.dart#L71-L72 there is an unchecked assumption scopes_supported will be present in the discovery document. I use an IDP which does not have this, and per the RFC spec, while recommended, it is not required: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8414#section-2 . Could there be a conditional check for this field similar to how other fields are conditionally checked?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Note that OAuth 2.0 is not OpenIdConnect. (it's as subset that is older than OpenIdConnect)
Do you have a reference to the OpenIdConnect relevant RFCs on this? Looks to me like it was changed to required along with claims_supported.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Thanks for following up - it's the same RECOMMENDED in the OpenID Connect spec: https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-discovery-1_0.html
RECOMMENDED
See #20 . Trying to merge it all as one.
No branches or pull requests
In https://github.com/4D-Technologies/openidconnect_flutter/blob/main/openidconnect/lib/src/config/openidconfiguration.dart#L71-L72 there is an unchecked assumption scopes_supported will be present in the discovery document. I use an IDP which does not have this, and per the RFC spec, while recommended, it is not required: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8414#section-2 . Could there be a conditional check for this field similar to how other fields are conditionally checked?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: